Achinoam Nini, known as Noa, is an internationally recognized Israeli singer
Achinoam Nini, known as Noa, is an internationally recognized Israeli singer

(Editor’s note: At press time, space was not available to print a full statement from a local group in the Jewish community opposed to the Noa concert planned at Adat Shalom. The full letter is posted at the end of this story.)

A May 18 concert by internationally known Israeli singer/songwriter Achinoam Nini, known as Noa, was canceled last Thursday by Adat Shalom Synagogue in Farmington Hills. In a letter to its membership, synagogue leadership cited security threats as the reason for its decision to cancel.

“We have been working closely with law enforcement and our security advisers and have concluded that, based on these threats, there was a high potential for disruption to the concert,” the letter states. “In keeping the safety of our community, our congregation and the performers as our highest priority, we have made the decision to cancel the concert.”

Adat Shalom Executive Director Alan Yost told the JN, “When we booked Noa, our sole intent was to provide Adat Shalom members as well as the Detroit Jewish community with an evening of quality entertainment by an internationally recognized Israeli entertainer. We knew she was clearly left-of-center in her political views. That wasn’t an issue because we were looking to provide an incredible performer.”

Alan Yost

Yost says when Adat Shalom reached out to some Zionist organizations for help in promoting the concert, they declined to participate because of Noa’s political views. The JN was the media sponsor for the concert.

“We respected that,” Yost said, “and we decided to continue on. Then we began to receive a lot of phone calls from individuals voicing significant displeasure with Noa’s appearance based on her political views and her ‘anti-Israel’ posture.

“Synagogue officers had a couple of conversations with a couple of individuals to get a feel for what they were looking for. They were communicating that the only thing acceptable to them as individuals was to cancel the concert; if not, [there would be the] possibility of protests, demonstrations and disruptions of the concert. This was a constant theme.”

From the conversations, Yost says, there was nothing on the level of a bomb threat and no use of the word “violent,” but the synagogue officers were concerned.

The synagogue’s Facebook page was then hit with about “250 negative posts from local and international addresses — all with the same theme: Cancel the concert,” Yost said. Some posts accused Adat Shalom of being “traitors” to the State of Israel.

Synagogue leaders consulted with Gary Sikorski, communitywide security expert for the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detroit, and talked with Farmington Hills police.

Federation’s policy is to offer security assistance to partner agencies and community organizations that request it. An organization’s decision to maintain or cancel a future event remains exclusively up to them, said Ted Cohen, Federation’s chief marketing officer.

Chief Chuck Nebus of the Farmington Hills Police Department said Adat Shalom reached out to request a police detail to cover the concert and told police the singer was controversial and that they’d had some threats. Nebus said the department did not give advice or tell them to cancel.

When it was determined the potential for a disruption could not be prevented, but only responded to, the synagogue’s executive committee made the unanimous decision to cancel the concert, Yost says.

“Our paramount desire is always the safety of members and the concertgoers,” Yost said.

Itamar Ilsar of West Bloomfield is part of a local Jewish group — comprised largely of Israelis and some American Jews — that opposed Noa’s presence because of her dovish political views. Ilsar said they did not make threats of violence and attempted to engage in a respectful and open dialogue with synagogue leaders to get them to cancel the concert.

Noa’s Politics

As news of the cancellation spread through the community, reactions varied. An initial brief JN post on its website and Facebook page last Friday prompted 7,000 page views as of press time and a long thread of comments. People voiced doubts about how serious the threats to the concert actually were, spoke of censorship and the right to free speech and debated Noa’s role as an Israeli musical treasure or an anti-Israel agitator.

This post was picked up by the Times of Israel, JTA, Haaretz and Yediot Achronot, Israel’s largest newspaper by circulation. On Monday, the Times of Israel posted a blog by Noa titled  “The Day They Let the Bullies Win.” It was the top opinion piece among the blogs and a JTA story about the issue was the fourth most-shared story on the website.

Noa is part of the “peace camp” in Israel. She has been outspoken in support of a two-state solution and Israeli-Arab co-existence. She has also voiced support for Israeli NGOs critical of the Israel Defense Forces and Israel’s actions in the West Bank.

The internationally known musician has appeared in Michigan many times. A quick glance at the Detroit Jewish News Foundation’s Davidson Digital Archive of Jewish Detroit History shows Noa has performed here at least six times since 1994, with the latest concert in 2013 in Ann Arbor. The Detroit Federation has sponsored her concerts as well as the Jewish Community Center — nearly always in conjunction with Israel Independence Day. In 2008, she headlined a concert with the Detroit Symphony Orchestra for Israel’s 60th anniversary.

Adat Shalom’s letter states, “Concerts such as this are part of Adat Shalom’s ongoing commitment to providing cultural and educational events to our members and to the community and are not intended to reflect political viewpoints.”

In an emailed statement to the JN, Noa said, “It is needless to say my concerts are not political manifestos; they are a celebration of the diversity and beauty of modern Israeli culture. After seven concerts in Detroit and thousands the world over, this should be known. Furthermore, I am certain the Jewish community has multiple mechanisms for dealing with security threats, both tangible and imaginary.

“Artists have always shed light on the deepest and most complex human emotion; they should be given wings to fly and inspire. I pray Jewish communities the world over return to the core value of ‘love your brother as you love yourself,’ and help shed light on an ailing world, as they have done throughout history.”

Still, Noa has faced opposition before for her political views.

Noa sings “There Must Be Another Way” with Arab Israeli performer Mira Awad

In 2009, she was asked to represent Israel in the annual Eurovision Song Contest. She performed with Israeli Arab Mira Awad, singing “There Must Be Another Way.” Some objected to the pairing. The women also performed together in East Lansing (2010) and Detroit (2012), the latter at a JCC event in West Bloomfield honoring Douglas Bloom, then JCC president, and his wife, Barbara.

In 2012, a Facebook petition headed by Israelis called for a boycott of her for participating in an alternative Yom HaZikaron (Israel Memorial Day) ceremony organized by Combatants for Peace, which brought together both Israelis and Palestinians who have lost family members in the conflict. Noa participated in this year’s ceremony in late April.

In 2016, the Jewish National Fund of Canada withdrew sponsorship of a Noa concert scheduled by the Jewish Federation of Vancouver for Yom Ha’Atzmaut reportedly because of concerns she supported the BDS movement that advocates boycott, divestment and sanctions against Israel. The Federation stuck with the concert, saying they were convinced Noa did not support BDS. Israel’s embassy in Ottawa and consulate in Toronto helped with funding after JNF dropped out.

At the time, Noa released a statement on Facebook, writing, “I am absolutely and completely against the BDS. I see it as a hypocritical movement full of contradictions who will not bring peace to Israel nor help the Palestinians achieve their goals; very much on the contrary.”

In January 2017, Noa posted a Facebook message blasting President Trump, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu and Jewish-American supporters of both. Writing “Trump is a modern-day Hitler” and a “racist madman,” she also wrote that Netanyahu is “just as racist, narcisitic (sic) paranoid and vulgar as Trump” and a “hollow, racist, corrupt little nothing …”

Jane Eisner, editor-in-chief of The Forward, wrote in a 2016 opinion piece that Noa’s “political awakening occurred Nov. 4, 1995, when moments after she performed at a massive peace rally in Tel Aviv, a Jewish radical pointed a gun on that very stage and assassinated Yitzhak Rabin. She decided that night to speak out as fearlessly as she could to promote the late prime minister’s policies.”

Last Saturday, on her Facebook page, Noa posted a Shabbat message “as a gentle reminder to all our friends in Detroit and elsewhere” that features a 2016 video greeting from the late Israeli President Shimon Peres to Noa on the 25th anniversary of her career. He praises her music as “the best music in the land.”

Moved To Action

What sparked action to shut down the concert from the self-described “large group of Israelis and American Jews, both liberals and conservatives who support both sides of the political map in Israel,” was that many of them learned of the upcoming concert while at the communitywide Yom HaZikaron program April 30 that commemorated IDF soldiers who died protecting Israel.

In a letter he posted on Adat Shalom’s Facebook page and circulated widely, Itamar Ilsar wrote, “I don’t even know where to start. My vision is still a bit blurry after watching a show about Yom HaZikaron and it’s hard for me to focus. Maybe start from the obvious, or what should be obvious: Adat Shalom means a congregation of peace.

“If you seek peace, please don’t host this singer in your synagogue. If you’re a member, please do some reading and research before buying your tickets.

“While Israel is a very diverse society with plenty of views, it would be fair to say that the overwhelming majority of Israelis want peace. People like Ms. Nini, however, represent a very small fraction of the Israeli society, and those who hold views and opinions like hers are considered very controversial. Yes, even in Israel.

“She is among those who call for an ‘alternative’ Memorial Day in Israel. Yes, where those who murdered innocent Israelis will be mentioned and remembered WITH their victims.

“If you want peace, don’t go to see her.

“Ms. Nini just recently called Mr. Trump ‘Hitler.’ While I can understand that some don’t like him and think he’s racist, I still can’t understand the comparison. A shameful one!

“Ms. Nini supports those who call Israel an apartheid state.

“If you support Israel, don’t go to this show. People like her fuel up the anti-Israeli propaganda. Are you part of this?”

Ilsar says his post and others put up by the group he’s part of were removed quickly from Adat Shalom’s Facebook page, prompting him to feel his voice was silenced.

Community Reactions

Under sunny skies at Sunday’s annual Walk/Run for Israel at Temple Shir Shalom in West Bloomfield, some discussed the canceled concert.

Longtime Hadassah leader Annette Meskin said many people came to her asking if the protests came from Arabs because the source of the threats was not made clear in Adat Shalom’s letter.

“ZOA decided not to take a stand on this one,” said Kobi Erez, ZOA director. “Even though there are different opinions [about her], at this time, we need to connect as a community rather than be divided.”

Mark Philips

Mark Phillips of Oak Park, treasurer of Ameinu, a progressive Zionist organization, said, “It’s scary if you get threats through email, phone and Facebook; I don’t blame Adat Shalom. But if you don’t like Noa and her politics, don’t go. Go stand outside with signs and protest; that is your right.

“When I heard why Noa’s concert was canceled, I said we have to find a way to bring her here under Ameinu’s auspices,” said Phillips, who added that those at the Ameinu table on Sunday requested the DJ to play some music by Noa. “We are not all conservative; there are progressives. She’s outspoken. A lot of artists are outspoken. In this day and age, to hear a progressive talking about Israel is very rare.”

Ed Chudnow of West Bloomfield said, “It is sad and unfortunate that this concert was canceled. Bringing Israeli culture to our community is positive and beneficial. Letting politics get in the way forgets the Hillel statement, ‘ahavat Yisrael’ or ‘love every Jew.’ We need to learn to transcend our differences for the sake of Torah.”

David Yaari

David Yaari of West Bloomfield served in the IDF in the 1980s. He understands that when it comes to the conversation about Israel, inclusiveness of different opinions is important. However, Israelis such as Noa, who have outwardly aligned themselves with groups critical of Israel like Breaking the Silence, he said, should have no audience in a community looking to invite in a performer to celebrate Israel’s independence.

“As an artist, she can do and say whatever she wants and she can have whatever opinion she wants,” Yaari said as he participated in the Walk for Israel. “But if you are against the IDF, you should not be chosen to represent Israel at a concert. Breaking the Silence goes all over the place telling people how horrible the Israeli Army is. To me, there is no silence to break. And without the Israeli Army, there would be no Israel.”

Sidney Beck of West Bloomfield said, “My feeling is that honorable people should be able to differentiate a person’s politics from their artistic abilities. There are many Jewish performers whose politics I don’t agree with, but I can still enjoy them. Canceling the concert was a mark against free speech. I don’t like Jane Fonda’s politics — and I served in Vietnam — but I do enjoy her movies. I can separate it.”

Keri Guten Cohen
Story Development Editor

Contributing Writers Don Cohen and Stacy Gittleman contributed to this report. 

UPDATE: LETTER WRITTEN BY ITAMAR ILSAR on behalf of a local group opposed to the Noa concert planned at Adat Shalom. 

In a letter sent May 2nd, 2017 to local Jewish community leaders including Adat Shalom leadership, I raised the issue that Achinoam Nini is a controversial artist who has been using her name recognition to promote her extremist political agenda.  The majority of Israelis on both sides of the mainstream political spectrum consider her beliefs to be outside the bounds of acceptable discourse, hostile, and offensive.

While we believe that every person and artist is entitled to voice their opinion, Ms. Nini has blurred the lines between what is an acceptable matter of opinion and what is outright propaganda. In the past few years it has been impossible to separate between the immensely talented artist and the divisive message she is trying to spread about Israel. Ms. Nini repeatedly uses controversial actions and language; compares leaders she disagrees with to Nazis and racists; serves on the board of an organization that financially supports anti-Israel groups such as “Breaking the silence”, deliberately omitting a verse about Israel’s return to Jerusalem in 1967 while performing the iconic song “Jerusalem of Gold” just to name a few examples.

I further stated that we were certain that Adat Shalom members, clergy, and board of directors would never knowingly promote an anti-Zionist statement. We feel that a synagogue that supports Israel might not be the best choice of venue for such an artist.  Our goal as a group was to voice our concern and potentially avoid a situation in which a Zionist synagogue within our Jewish community is perceived to make a political statement about Israel.

The Hebrew term for synagogue, Beit Knesset, means “house of gathering.”  Outside of Israel, this has a greater and more sacred meaning; a place in which Jews can unite and build a community. A place that advocates for peace, unity and Jewish and human values. We think that a Zionist synagogue is not the place for a performer so divisive and controversial.

None of us made any threats of violence – it’s worth mentioning that while Adat Shalom deleted concerned messages we posted and blocked us from their Facebook page, we still attempted to engage in a respectful and open dialogue.  We are a large group of Israelis and American Jews, both liberals and conservatives who support both sides of the political map in Israel. The Israelis among us all served in the IDF, as did some of our American friends.

Our friends include members of Adat Shalom and we all support at least one Zionist or Jewish cause.

Our goal was that we, as a community, could come together and resolve this situation and move forward united as one people. Our approach, actions and language throughout this process were respectful, polite and positive.

Israel’s President recently said “Despite our differences, we are one nation – a Jewish and democratic nation – with responsibility for each other and the right to demand tolerance from each other.”

We are hopeful that these chain of events will bring us together, unite us as one and make us stronger as a community.

Am Yisrael Chai!

Itamar Ilsar

Previous articleA Life In Music
Next articleCranbrook Academy of Art graduating students exhibition


  1. I’m glad Adat Shalom did this. Good for them. It may sound like they’re against free speech and expression but this was a good choice and stops any serious issues that could have happened. Besides, Noa is not pro-Israel at all. If you are pushing for Israel, she is a bad example. Find another singer who loves Israel.

    That brings me to another point. A lot of people are mad at the Right-Wing Jews because this happened and believe what you want. Now maybe I am wrong but if Adat Shalom decided to have a singer who was very pro-Israel, Right Wing and a fan of Trump, would the Left-Wing Jews protest this and try to get it cancelled? I’d love to see all of your answers to this question.

    Kudos to Itamar and David Yaari. Two outstanding gentleman.

  2. Adat Shalom deleted all the post and blocked the people who post. This is not a free speech. What a shame. The community need to say thank you for those who stand and said their opinion. Or at least try to say there opinion.
    We all need to salute to those who was trying to show us who is Noa Nini.
    She is a great singer but full of hate.

  3. Well, in response to this cancellation from well meaning but misguided Zionists, I have now decided to stop any support for Israel financially. As well as for Adat Shalom. Now that the bar has been set to what is acceptable and what is not, I wonder what is next? Will we now have to go through the Zionist police (namely, those who were most driven against singer Noa) to vet the next speaker? I can’t even imagine what would happen if a J street leader were to appear in Farmington Hills. If this were the 1960s, I can’t imagine Martin Luther King, Jr would have been welcomed in to such a synagogue.

    This is not a “left” vs. “right” issue, but a “free speech” and “openness” issue. The Israeli criticism has now been muted. I’m not a fan or critic of Noa, but rather a fan of tolerance.

    Did Adat Shalom leadership give a reason why not even a single vote from the board supported bringing in Noa? Did they give a single reason why they were not complete in their explanation to the community, rather than a vague meaningless letter with the nondescript “threats” or whatever language they used? This whole transaction is very dangerous

  4. Response to Joann:
    Free speech is a federally protected right–but it does not apply to private organizations or websites. People–including me–use the term a lot, but any Facebook host can choose what to post and not. Just go to any political or controversial page. News organizations have increasingly shut down their comments sections due to the noise, racism, threats. So Adat Shalom has no obligation to post anything and everything. And for you to complain about what they post, while shutting down Noa is ironic.

  5. Response to The Concerned S.:
    A synagogue is not a private business. It’s a non profit organization that need to welcome and respect the community. As far as I understand some the people in the group are Adat Shalom members and also try to say their opinion.
    This singer is a big conflict. A Jewish place doesn’t need to host a singer like this.

  6. A synagogue should not get involved with singers that mix music and politics.
    Big mistake to bring her from the beginning.

  7. Running away from a potential threat never has, and never will, solve anything. All this type of (non) action does is prove to enemies that if they make a threat then the threatened party will go running away without putting up any resistance.

    I always thou that “NEVER AGAIN” meant the we, s individuals and as a community, would not cower in fear, but we would face those who threatened us and fight for our rights.

    This blatant act of cowardice only encourages those who would do us harm Shame on us.

  8. There is no lack of great Israeli performers, artists, speakers, etc. to choose from. Noa should stick to her G-d given talents the same as Hollywood actors who feel it necessary to criticize Israel; she grew up in NYC & did not serve in the army. She crossed the line by using her talent to expect us to applaud her while she promotes anti Israel rhetoric; she alone is responsible for the community division. When she was invited to perform for one of our most amazing & sad holiday’s she should have declined, but glory & money were more important to her misguided ego. Her invitation to perform on Yom Haatzmaut was clearly a mistake of scheduling on the wrong day. The Freedom of speech issue can be corrected by Adat Shalom having an anti-Israel event, that would be the appropriate time to host Noa, BDS, Hamas, etc.

  9. Congratulations to Ameinu for expressing its desire to find a way to reschedule the concert by Noa. I would only hope that the Federation, the JCC, and other organizations will recognize how important it is for the sake of the community to join with Ameinu and make this a community event. Besides expressing the community’s antipathy toward any kind of bullying. it will be sponsoring a concert by one of Israel’s most celebrated singers that will be enjoyed by all who attend.

  10. So happy that the synagogue canceled her concert. A synagogue is not s place for her. There are a lot of super talent Israeli musicians. Choose wise next time. Say no to any political musicians

  11. Yes, Itamar, Keri and the Jewish News should be thanked for the reportage of this dreadful moment in the history of the Detroit Jewish community. Actually, the article asks a serious question, which is, “how will the community repair the damage that has been done and learn how to discuss important — no, critical issues — without the kind of threats and accusations that have been made.

    At the end of your letter, you suggested that, as a result of this chain of events, the community might come together. Unfortunately, unity doesn’t mean what you want it to mean. In your view, to achieve unity, everyone must agree with your approach to Israel and how we express our love and support to our Jewish State. But, that won’t happen, because there are so many different views and so many ways to do so.

    I suggested, in an earlier response, that the community, through the Federation and other organizations, religious and secular, reschedule the concert as an expression of antipathy toward the bullying that has been going on since the campaign to cancel it began. I still believe that it is important to do this. But, let the concert be a piece of a larger program that would focus on the need to recognize the diversity that is the Detroit Jewish community. Let there be dialogues among people of different viewpoints, always focused on listening to the other discussant and addressing the points being made — not making ad hominem accusations, as we continue to see with regularity. I would even suggest that a singer/entertainer whose political views are opposed to Noa’s be invited to perform.

    Whatever is done, it is time to get off the dime and seriously address the need for the Detroit Jewish community to, as you wrote, unite, but unite as a the diverse community, with diverse opinions, that it is.

  12. Response to Gordon:
    This singer is more than welcome to preform in any non religious place. A synagogue is not a place for her!

  13. Gordon Silverman – the problem is that there were never any credible threats, no one has threaten Adat Shalom, rater, they were asked to cancel the show. The fact that they came out with that statement like there were threats, that’s their twisting of the words. The fact is that Adat Shalom was not interested in a dialogue, did not want to listen as to why this is an issue, and instead just earsed and censored and concern that was communicated their way! But that’s ok apparently. Also, if this was someone, some artist from the other side of the political map (right) they would never think that’s ok to invite for a preformance. How is that ok that a synagogue that boast themselves as being zioninstic can bring over such a prefomer who’s public action supports anything against Israel???

  14. Dear Mr. Silverman:

    I didn’t plan to answer individual responses,but I will do it anyways.
    What do you think that I would like unity to mean? I’d love to hear!
    Let me assist with referring you to a quote that I included in my letter:

    Israel’s President recently said “Despite our differences, we are one nation – a Jewish and democratic nation – with responsibility for each other and the right to demand tolerance from each other.”

    Did it help, or do you still think that in my view unity means that everyone thinks like me?

    If it didn’t help, let me tell you that many of my friends think that Benjamin Netanhayu is God’s gift to humanity, while many others think he should step down from office immediately.

    Did this helps?

    And as to your idea to invite an artist whose opinions oppose Noa’s, would you consider having Ariel Zilber or Yoav Eliasi to Adat Shalom?
    How about the previous Israeli Knesset Member Michael Ben-Ari?

    You can read about them here:

  15. The way this article is put together highlights the extreme disconnect between the Jewish community in the USA and that in Israel.
    I write this as a Detroit born American who has lived in Israel more years than I lived in the United States. I write this as an Israeli Jew, speaking to my American brothers and sisters.
    You don’t understand. Not at all.
    Israel is a land of freedom. Free speech is cherished, often to extreme levels. It is fashionable for the artists and media to belong to the political left (exactly the opposite of the majority of the country who has right leaning tendencies). There is no problem with criticism. There is no problem with belonging to the “peace camp”.
    (BTW – do you realize how arrogant and offensive the term “peace camp” is? Do you really think everyone on the right wants war?).
    Obviously, there are few people in the world who are as talented as Achinoam “Noa” Nini. She is world renowned for her voice and rightly so. Although she is high in demand for performances for world leaders there is very little demand for her in Israel. She spends very little time here. Do you know why? Her behavior has made her unofficially “persona non-grata”.
    This isn’t a matter of freedom of speech. Anyone can say whatever they want. But there are consequences. Noa is entitled to her opinions. The fact that her opinions are so extreme, that she has more sympathy for the terrorists that murder Israelis than for her fellow Israelis, is what makes her repugnant to the majority of the population here.
    But in America it is easy to declare that it’s “just about music, one should be able to differentiate the performer and her opinions.”
    In the article, Jane Fonda is given as an example of a performer with objectionable politics that an “honorable” person “should be able to differentiate a person’s politics from their artistic abilities.” Let’s consider Ms. Fonda. What did she actually do? Many young people were against the Vietnam War but she seemed to publicly be siding with the enemy while there were American POWs. She crossed a line that many Americans, especially soldiers and people whose loved ones were soldiers considered unforgivable. To this day, there are people who have not forgiven her, even though she has since apologized repeatedly.
    Now consider Noa. She doesn’t just have political opinions. She has an agenda that supports those who attack Israel while ripping in to Israeli society and the democratically elected government. To her, Mahmoud Abbas, a terrorist financier, inciter and Holocaust denier is a “man of peace” while Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is a Nazi. To her organizations that undermine the IDF, publishing lies about Israeli soldiers in international forums are legitimate and “peace loving”. Every possible opportunity she implies that it is Israel’s fault terrorists are murdering us. That we are the violent and vile people while those attacking us are perfectly fine.
    Noa, at every chance she gets, gives justification to those who commit acts of terror and war against her own people.
    This stance is revolting to Israelis but even so, would be overlooked – if she did not push it so hard on people who attend her concerts, who listen to her speak publicly.
    The problem is that going to her concert means supporting her agenda. Hiring her to sing means supporting her agenda – because she is so vocal about it, it is impossible to separate the singer from the anti-Israel tune she is singing in every possible venue.
    In America, it is easy to declare that it’s “just about music” because it’s not your children that are put in danger because of this woman’s ideas.
    Americans couldn’t forgive Ms. Fonda for seeming to justify those attacking American soldiers fighting in a land that had nothing to do with the lives of the average American. Noa justifies those who are murdering Israelis in our own land, every opportunity she gets, in every forum, in front of world leaders. She supports those who vilify Israeli soldiers, the protectors of Israel, WHILE Israelis are being murdered. And she has done so for years.
    Now the question is – is it acceptable to pressure people that hire Noa to shut down the concerts? In a normal situation, I would say no. Threats of violence are certainly unacceptable (and from everything I read it seems that there were no actual threats of violence). This however, is not a normal situation.

    Frankly I was pleased to learn that there are some American Jews aware enough of what is happening to declare that hiring this woman is unacceptable. Often, from Israel, it seems like American Jews are so out of touch that they have no idea what is happening in Israel or could care less. From the comfort of America, it may seem acceptable to “simply enjoy the music and ignore the politics” but what is being ignored is the security of the only Jewish homeland in the world. What is being ignored is our struggle for survival and the struggle to keep this land safe for all Jews if and when they need to come. (The Jews of France understand what this means. I pray you never will be forced to truly understand this).
    What is also being ignored is that the enemies of Jews always see Jews first. Because you are comfortable does not mean that you are safe from Jew hate. The Jews of Germany felt that they were Germans first but their neighbors felt otherwise. You may think Noa’s extremism affects only Israelis and as such, you can ignore it, but if you need to send your kids to college, in America, you might begin to feel differently about people like Noa and the anti-Israel organizations she supports.
    Not to speak is to speak.
    This isn’t about free speech. This is about life.

    It is time to stand up for Zion. Even if that means missing out on some good music.

  16. To Mr. Ilsar and other leaders of this boycott (and to Adat Shalom who fearfully cowered), Welcome to the BDS. You have become what you claim to hate.

  17. You might be very right about there not having been any credible threats made against Adat Shalom. Don’t be so quick to come to that conclusion, though. Remember that law enforcement and security agencies did suggest that there were threats. It would be a good idea to make the correspondence (including Mr. Ilsar’s original letter) and the telephone messages public so that we can judge whether there was anything serious, anything threatening in them.

    At the same time, I question whether Adat Shalom was too cautious in making that decision. Are they not willing to have a dialogue? Maybe. They should be asked that question.

  18. As the article mentioned, “the singer”, as you put it, did perform at the Jewish Community Center in 2012. I am not sure what the difference between the JCC and a synagogue is. Could you explain?

  19. Mr. Silverman,

    I hereby give permission to publish any written correspondence made by me in that regard, provided that it is brought in its entirety, and without any edits. I also give permission to the Adat Shalom Clergy member I’ve been in touch with to discuss the content of the conversation we had earlier this month.

  20. Dear Mr. Ilsar,

    I will take you at your word that you are committed to a diverse Jewish and democratic nation. I will also take you at your word that you do want find a way to bring the divergent segments of the community together.

    I would suggest, then, that you contact Mark Phillips, the treasurer of Ameinu, and explore the possibility of convening a series of encounters among the various groups and individuals. He seems to be interested in opening up a constructive conversation. By the way, it would be a good idea to approach the JCC, which hosted the Noa concert in 2012. Would the Center, with co-sponsors from every sector of the community, sponsor a multi-day program devoted to Jewish unity, locally, nationally and internationally. The program could use President Rivlin’s statement as a jump off point. And, yes, it is important to reschedule the concert. As I wrote, before, let the stage be shared with other entertainers, even the ones who you mentioned in your note, if this is what the community would want. (From your tone, you wouldn’t accept them. The question, of course, is whether there is equivalence between them and Noa. That question could be a topic of discussion, by the way. )

    As you do this, it is very important that the facts be established. Were there threats made to Adat Shalom? Were accusations made that the synagogue is not supportive of Israel? Without corroboration of fact, the discussion could serious falter and fall back into accusations and name calling.

    Whatever is done, it is essential that this situation be confronted…for the sake of Israel and the local Jewish community.

    By the way, I just found out that the Federation was approached by Adat Shalom and was asked to move the concert to the Jewish Center. The Federation refused, telling Adat Shalom to deal with it themselves. The drama continues.

  21. My goodness, Forest Rain, you have just ridden the American Jewish community out of anything that has to do with Israel. Remind me about this when I am asked to advocate for Israel (from which I have been divorced) and to contribute to an Israeli institution and/or cause.

  22. I find your comment very sad.
    BDS is a hypocritical organization striving to destroy Israel through economic warfare. They pretend to be about human rights but don’t care that it is Arabs who are working the Israeli factories they want to boycott, Arabs who make much higher wages including social security, health care and vacation days – things they can never attain in PA controlled businesses. BDS dooms Arabs to poverty out of hate for Jews. Interestingly BDSers always end up shouting “from the river to the sea Palestine must be free” – i.e. free of Jews, genocide.
    On the other hand, you have Jews who find it unacceptable to endorse someone who sides with terrorists over her own people, during a war.
    One is active hate, a will to destroy, just for the sake of destroying. The other is self-respect, a belief that Jewish lives matter.
    Sad that you can’t see the difference.

  23. It is very good to know that Detroit has such a vibrant Jewish community that cares about what its expression of Jewishness stands for. I am linked to this story through a reference to it in Jews Down Under story and I found it fascinating.
    So Adat Shalom decides to hold a concert with an artist that, if we take what some have made comment, would have a tough job getting a gig in Israel. Some in the community said “not in my name”. Adat Shalom took the “shalom habait” option and cancelled the gig. A remarkably healthy debate ensues. Kol haKavod.
    Before this story I had not known of the artist. But a quick search turns up a TED talk she gave at the Eastern Mediterranean International School (EMIS). This is one impressive Jew. Irrespective of what you might think about her politics….this is one impressive Jew. And she has one hell of a voice.

Comments are closed.